Place |
Name Last,First |
Mover/ Loser |
Total Points |
Possible Points |
Points Gauge |
Predicted Champion |
Pick Pct. |
Tie Break |
Final |
Picked Champion |
32 |
16 |
8 |
4 |
2 |
591 |
Abbott, Jim |
(-8) |
57 |
57 |
|
Kansas |
62% |
153 |
25 |
12 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
118 |
Abbott, Jim 2 |
(+50) |
121 |
121 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
157 |
23 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
412 |
Alexander "Sandy: Scott |
(-125) |
81 |
81 |
|
Houston |
57% |
157 |
19 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
570 |
Alexander "Sandy: Scott 2 |
(-4) |
59 |
59 |
|
Tennessee |
51% |
145 |
19 |
8 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
606 |
almeida michael 2 |
(-13) |
56 |
56 |
|
N. Carolina |
54% |
173 |
18 |
13 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
560 |
almeida, michael |
(-12) |
61 |
61 |
|
Iowa St |
54% |
162 |
19 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
57 |
almeida, michael 1 |
(+21) |
132 |
132 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
168 |
18 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
463 |
almeida, michael 3 |
(-59) |
74 |
74 |
|
Duke |
57% |
178 |
18 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
34 |
almeida, michael 4 |
(+8) |
137 |
137 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
173 |
19 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
79 |
Anderson, Caroline |
(+38) |
126 |
126 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
137 |
20 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
98 |
Andrade, Mark 1 |
(+45) |
123 |
123 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
137 |
25 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
69 |
Andrade,Mark 2 |
(+31) |
129 |
129 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
138 |
23 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
103 |
Aratari Joey 1 |
(+40) |
123 |
123 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
169 |
23 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
655 |
Aratari Joey 2 |
(-4) |
49 |
49 |
|
Auburn |
54% |
169 |
23 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
648 |
Aratari John Paul 2 |
(-5) |
51 |
51 |
|
Tennessee |
49% |
173 |
19 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
692 |
Aratari John Paul 3 |
NC (0) |
29 |
29 |
|
Arizona |
38% |
179 |
19 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
348 |
Aratari John Paul 4 |
(-205) |
91 |
91 |
|
Tennessee |
70% |
175 |
25 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
482 |
Aratari John Paul 5 |
(-45) |
71 |
71 |
|
Houston |
57% |
169 |
19 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
654 |
Aratari John Paul 6 |
(-3) |
49 |
49 |
|
Illinois |
49% |
167 |
23 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
483 |
Aratari John Paul 7 |
(-46) |
71 |
71 |
|
Houston |
48% |
179 |
19 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
688 |
Aratari John Paul Sheet 1 |
NC (0) |
36 |
36 |
|
Kentucky |
46% |
145 |
22 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
426 |
Aratari Lindsay 1 |
(-102) |
79 |
79 |
|
Kansas |
59% |
179 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
511 |
Aratari Lindsay 2 |
(-22) |
67 |
67 |
|
Iowa St |
56% |
178 |
21 |
9 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
449 |
Aratari Lindsay 3 |
(-73) |
76 |
76 |
|
Purdue |
60% |
179 |
24 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
524 |
Aratari Lindsay 4 |
(-19) |
65 |
65 |
|
Arizona |
56% |
172 |
19 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
514 |
Aratari Lindsay 5 |
(-16) |
66 |
66 |
|
Kentucky |
57% |
179 |
20 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
471 |
Aratari Lindsay 6 |
(-58) |
73 |
73 |
|
Duke |
57% |
177 |
19 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
341 |
Bachand,B1 |
(+217) |
92 |
92 |
|
Connecticut |
46% |
159 |
18 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
454 |
Bachand,B2 |
(-60) |
75 |
75 |
|
Houston |
52% |
160 |
19 |
8 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
200t |
Balogh, Jake |
(+104) |
112 |
112 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
158 |
20 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
96 |
Balogh, Nate 1 |
(+35) |
124 |
124 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
156 |
22 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
543 |
Balogh, Nate 2 |
(-17) |
63 |
63 |
|
Houston |
56% |
158 |
19 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
113t |
Balogh, Phil - 1 |
(+55) |
121 |
121 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
143 |
21 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
13t |
Balogh, Phil - 2 |
(+8) |
140 |
140 |
|
Connecticut |
70% |
143 |
24 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
281t |
Balogh, Phil - 3 |
(-221) |
103 |
103 |
|
Houston |
63% |
143 |
19 |
12 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
NO |
527 |
Balogh, Phil - 4 |
(-9) |
64 |
64 |
|
Houston |
59% |
143 |
20 |
12 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
151 |
Barbara Stover |
(+81) |
116 |
116 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
146 |
22 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
184 |
Barbeau, Steven 1 |
(+103) |
113 |
113 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
126 |
19 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
176 |
Barnes, Dennis |
(+90) |
114 |
114 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
151 |
20 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
332 |
Barnes, Dennis 2 |
(+194) |
95 |
95 |
|
Connecticut |
49% |
151 |
19 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
539t |
Barnes, Dennis 3 |
(-13) |
63 |
63 |
|
Kentucky |
56% |
151 |
19 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
498 |
Barnes, James 2 |
(-37) |
69 |
69 |
|
Texas |
48% |
170 |
21 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
148 |
Barnes, Jillian |
(+84) |
116 |
116 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
133 |
24 |
10 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
342 |
Barnes, Jim 1 |
(+216) |
92 |
92 |
|
Connecticut |
48% |
190 |
20 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
656 |
Barnes, Jim 3 |
(-5) |
49 |
49 |
|
N. Carolina |
49% |
190 |
19 |
9 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
593 |
Barnes, Jim 4 |
(-10) |
57 |
57 |
|
Kentucky |
54% |
186 |
23 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
232t |
Barnes, Kristen |
(+126) |
109 |
109 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
153 |
21 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
311 |
Barnes, Misty |
(+178) |
99 |
99 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
136 |
23 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
162 |
Barnes, Timmy |
(+84) |
115 |
115 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
155 |
21 |
15 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
54 |
barry 1 |
(+24) |
132 |
132 |
|
Connecticut |
75% |
138 |
24 |
14 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
476 |
Barry 2 |
(-39) |
71 |
71 |
|
Purdue |
52% |
144 |
19 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
583 |
Barry 3 |
(-11) |
58 |
58 |
|
Houston |
60% |
111 |
24 |
11 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
250 |
Barry 4 |
(+126) |
108 |
108 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
155 |
18 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
546 |
Barry 5 (Nick) |
(-5) |
62 |
62 |
|
Creighton |
44% |
133 |
18 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
261 |
bell, Ken #1 |
(+143) |
106 |
106 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
156 |
24 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
383 |
bell, Ken #2 |
(-167) |
85 |
85 |
|
Purdue |
62% |
162 |
21 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
561 |
Bell,Moya |
(-13) |
61 |
61 |
|
Gonzaga |
57% |
165 |
23 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
581 |
Bellmore, Nancy |
(-9) |
58 |
58 |
|
N. Carolina |
57% |
154 |
24 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
119 |
Bellmore, Shawn |
(+63) |
120 |
120 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
143 |
22 |
11 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
281t |
Bellmore, Shawn 2nd |
(+156) |
103 |
103 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
143 |
21 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
427 |
biff |
(-103) |
79 |
79 |
|
Kentucky |
59% |
180 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
537 |
biff 2 |
(-11) |
63 |
63 |
|
Houston |
62% |
125 |
23 |
12 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
433 |
Biff 3 |
(-95) |
78 |
78 |
|
Tennessee |
59% |
144 |
22 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
13t |
Biff 4 |
(+8) |
140 |
140 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
143 |
20 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
523 |
Bird, Larry 1 |
(-18) |
65 |
65 |
|
Arizona |
56% |
152 |
19 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
254 |
Bird, Larry 2 |
(-224) |
107 |
107 |
|
Purdue |
63% |
140 |
19 |
14 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
372t |
Bird, Larry 3 |
(-167) |
86 |
86 |
|
Purdue |
57% |
145 |
18 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
198 |
Bolt, Andy |
(+106) |
112 |
112 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
152 |
20 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
307 |
Bolt, Cooper |
(+170) |
100 |
100 |
|
Connecticut |
51% |
152 |
18 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
60 |
Bolt, Riley |
(+25) |
131 |
131 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
156 |
21 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
411 |
Bortolussi Vic |
(-124) |
81 |
81 |
|
Creighton |
62% |
154 |
23 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
559 |
Bouffard, N 1 |
(-11) |
61 |
61 |
|
NC State |
57% |
155 |
23 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
674 |
Bouffard, N 2 |
(-2) |
45 |
45 |
|
Arizona |
46% |
155 |
21 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
258 |
Brian Leger 1 |
(-228) |
107 |
107 |
|
Purdue |
62% |
156 |
19 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
340 |
Brian Leger 2 |
(-209) |
92 |
92 |
|
Kentucky |
65% |
156 |
22 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
479 |
Brian Leger 3 |
(-42) |
71 |
71 |
|
Houston |
49% |
157 |
17 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
682 |
Brouillard, Andrew |
NC (0) |
39 |
39 |
|
Houston |
44% |
138 |
19 |
8 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
378 |
Brouillard, Andrew 2 |
(+244) |
85 |
85 |
|
Connecticut |
35% |
140 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
536 |
Brouillard, Andrew 3 |
(-10) |
63 |
63 |
|
Purdue |
35% |
144 |
13 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
243 |
Brouillard, Liz |
(+133) |
108 |
108 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
141 |
20 |
8 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
680 |
Brouillard,Emily |
NC (0) |
40 |
40 |
|
Illinois |
43% |
111 |
18 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
263 |
Cabral, Jeff 17 |
(+150) |
105 |
105 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
131 |
21 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
658 |
Cabral, Jeff 18 |
(-1) |
48 |
48 |
|
Iowa St |
51% |
125 |
20 |
10 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
668 |
Cabral, Jeff 19 |
(-3) |
46 |
46 |
|
Gonzaga |
44% |
122 |
18 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
335 |
Cabral, Jeff 20 |
(-211) |
93 |
93 |
|
Purdue |
51% |
133 |
17 |
8 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
142 |
Cambio, Greg 1 |
(+74) |
117 |
117 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
127 |
19 |
9 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
509 |
Cambio, Greg 2 |
(-20) |
67 |
67 |
|
N. Carolina |
62% |
125 |
23 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
665 |
Cambio, Greg 3 |
NC (0) |
46 |
46 |
|
Houston |
48% |
125 |
18 |
10 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
419 |
Cambio, Greg 4 |
(-115) |
80 |
80 |
|
Purdue |
59% |
125 |
20 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
452 |
Cambio, Greg 5 |
(-58) |
75 |
75 |
|
Tennessee |
54% |
125 |
19 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
269 |
Camp,Peter |
(+144) |
105 |
105 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
153 |
19 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
200t |
Carabba, Rich #3 |
(+104) |
112 |
112 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
158 |
20 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
638 |
Carabba,Rich #1 |
(-8) |
52 |
52 |
|
Iowa St |
52% |
150 |
18 |
13 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
6 |
Carabba,Rich #2 |
(+1) |
144 |
144 |
|
Connecticut |
71% |
154 |
24 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
547t |
Carabba,Rich #4 |
(-6) |
62 |
62 |
|
Houston |
62% |
140 |
22 |
14 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
407 |
Carder, Scott 1 |
(-141) |
82 |
82 |
|
Houston |
60% |
168 |
20 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
414 |
Carder, Scott 2 |
(-110) |
80 |
80 |
|
Purdue |
62% |
134 |
22 |
13 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
287 |
Carlson Scott |
(+150) |
103 |
103 |
|
Connecticut |
54% |
160 |
19 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
163 |
Celtik |
(+83) |
115 |
115 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
157 |
19 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
20 |
Cetta, Colleen1 |
(+10) |
139 |
139 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
144 |
21 |
9 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
YES! |
493 |
Cetta, Colleen2 |
(-32) |
69 |
69 |
|
N. Carolina |
54% |
144 |
21 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
686 |
Cetta, Colleen3 |
NC (0) |
37 |
37 |
|
Arizona |
46% |
144 |
21 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
446t |
Cetta, Colleen4 |
(-70) |
76 |
76 |
|
N. Carolina |
48% |
144 |
16 |
8 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
465t |
Cetta, Joe1 |
(-52) |
73 |
73 |
|
Purdue |
57% |
144 |
23 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
171t |
Cetta, Joe10 |
(+95) |
114 |
114 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
144 |
24 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
554t |
Cetta, Joe11 |
(-6) |
61 |
61 |
|
Purdue |
48% |
144 |
21 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
631t |
Cetta, Joe12 |
(-1) |
52 |
52 |
|
Arizona |
54% |
144 |
20 |
12 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
291 |
Cetta, Joe13 |
(+159) |
102 |
102 |
|
Connecticut |
52% |
144 |
20 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
631t |
Cetta, Joe14 |
(-1) |
52 |
52 |
|
Houston |
48% |
144 |
18 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
690 |
Cetta, Joe15 |
NC (0) |
35 |
35 |
|
Tennessee |
41% |
144 |
19 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
171t |
Cetta, Joe16 |
(+95) |
114 |
114 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
144 |
26 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
508 |
Cetta, Joe2 |
(-19) |
67 |
67 |
|
N. Carolina |
60% |
144 |
23 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
229 |
Cetta, Joe3 |
(+129) |
109 |
109 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
144 |
23 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
159 |
Cetta, Joe5 |
(+87) |
115 |
115 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
144 |
23 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
631t |
Cetta, Joe6 |
(-1) |
52 |
52 |
|
Houston |
52% |
144 |
24 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
244 |
Cetta, Joe7 |
(-223) |
108 |
108 |
|
Purdue |
62% |
144 |
22 |
9 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
NO |
625 |
Cetta, Joe8 |
(-3) |
53 |
53 |
|
N. Carolina |
49% |
144 |
19 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
336 |
Cetta, Joe9 |
(-212) |
93 |
93 |
|
Purdue |
65% |
144 |
23 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
352t |
Cetta,Joe4 |
(-198) |
90 |
90 |
|
N. Carolina |
63% |
144 |
22 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
185 |
Clark, Bob |
(+102) |
113 |
113 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
145 |
21 |
10 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
592 |
Clark, Bob 2 |
(-9) |
57 |
57 |
|
N. Carolina |
60% |
164 |
23 |
13 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
566 |
Clark, Braeden |
(-8) |
60 |
60 |
|
N. Carolina |
57% |
156 |
22 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
89 |
Clark, Braeden 2 |
(+35) |
125 |
125 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
170 |
21 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
308 |
Cole, Michael |
(+169) |
100 |
100 |
|
Connecticut |
51% |
154 |
18 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
617t |
Cole, Michael 2 |
(-3) |
54 |
54 |
|
Kentucky |
40% |
150 |
14 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
218 |
Colleen A Gribbin 1 |
(+120) |
110 |
110 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
140 |
20 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
195 |
Colleen A Gribbin 2 |
(+109) |
112 |
112 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
124 |
20 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
46t |
Conti ,Greg 1 |
(+23) |
134 |
134 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
128 |
22 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
90t |
Conti,Greg 2 |
(+41) |
124 |
124 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
140 |
22 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
657 |
Cordeiro, A |
NC (0) |
48 |
48 |
|
Baylor |
52% |
135 |
22 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
49 |
Cordeiro, A2 |
(+20) |
134 |
134 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
149 |
18 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
400t |
cordeiro, A3 |
(-134) |
82 |
82 |
|
Duke |
62% |
138 |
22 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
405 |
Cordeiro, E |
(-139) |
82 |
82 |
|
Houston |
57% |
147 |
20 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
360 |
Costaregni, Megan |
(-192) |
89 |
89 |
|
Purdue |
60% |
148 |
19 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
75 |
Costaregni, Patrick |
(+35) |
127 |
127 |
|
Connecticut |
54% |
150 |
17 |
9 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
327 |
Costaregni, Shelly |
(-221) |
96 |
96 |
|
Purdue |
65% |
145 |
22 |
11 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
182t |
Costaregni,Matt |
(+105) |
113 |
113 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
142 |
19 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
392 |
Cote, James |
(-146) |
83 |
83 |
|
Iowa St |
63% |
139 |
23 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
193t |
Cote, John |
(+111) |
112 |
112 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
131 |
20 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
349 |
Courtney, Rich-1 |
(-195) |
90 |
90 |
|
NC State |
65% |
133 |
24 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
542 |
Courtney, Rich-2 |
(-16) |
63 |
63 |
|
Marquette |
57% |
115 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
495 |
Cox, Dave1 |
(-34) |
69 |
69 |
|
Houston |
62% |
153 |
23 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
120 |
Cox, Dave2 |
(+62) |
120 |
120 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
145 |
22 |
9 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
22 |
Cox, Dave3 |
(+8) |
139 |
139 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
173 |
21 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
477 |
Cox, Dave4 |
(-40) |
71 |
71 |
|
N. Carolina |
54% |
145 |
17 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
36 |
Cox, Dave5 |
(+15) |
136 |
136 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
145 |
22 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
368 |
Cox, Dave6 |
(-173) |
87 |
87 |
|
Tennessee |
62% |
145 |
21 |
11 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
534t |
Cox,jared |
(-8) |
63 |
63 |
|
N. Carolina |
57% |
128 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
71 |
Cox,Jared 2 |
(+29) |
129 |
129 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
158 |
17 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
428t |
Cox,Jared 3 |
(-90) |
78 |
78 |
|
Houston |
57% |
132 |
20 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
108 |
D'Elia, Joe 1 |
(+46) |
122 |
122 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
156 |
22 |
14 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
647 |
D'Elia, Joe 2 |
(-4) |
51 |
51 |
|
Illinois |
56% |
165 |
23 |
10 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
490t |
Dalen,Rick(1) |
(-29) |
69 |
69 |
|
Purdue |
54% |
142 |
21 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
9 |
Dalen,Rick(2) |
(+7) |
141 |
141 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
142 |
17 |
12 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
363 |
Dalen,Rick(3) |
(-181) |
88 |
88 |
|
Houston |
60% |
142 |
22 |
9 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
216 |
Daniel, Eric |
(+122) |
110 |
110 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
135 |
20 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
67 |
DCoop1 |
(+26) |
130 |
130 |
|
Connecticut |
73% |
180 |
26 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
649 |
Dcoop2 |
(-6) |
51 |
51 |
|
Arizona |
51% |
186 |
19 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
420 |
Dcoop3 |
(-116) |
80 |
80 |
|
Illinois |
59% |
194 |
20 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
62 |
Dcoop5 |
(+23) |
131 |
131 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
178 |
21 |
13 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
456 |
Dcoop6 |
(-62) |
75 |
75 |
|
Tennessee |
56% |
184 |
21 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
499 |
DCoopM4 |
(-38) |
69 |
69 |
|
Auburn |
46% |
172 |
19 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
209 |
Debbie Carder 1 |
(+115) |
111 |
111 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
147 |
21 |
13 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
569 |
Debbie Carder 2 |
(-3) |
59 |
59 |
|
Iowa St |
59% |
140 |
21 |
13 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
550 |
Decorpo, Charles 1 |
(-9) |
62 |
62 |
|
Arizona |
54% |
144 |
18 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
554t |
Decorpo, Charles 2 |
(-6) |
61 |
61 |
|
N. Carolina |
57% |
144 |
19 |
13 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
672 |
Decorpo, Charles 3 |
NC (0) |
45 |
45 |
|
Arizona |
49% |
146 |
19 |
11 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
597 |
Decorpo, Charles 4 |
(-4) |
56 |
56 |
|
Illinois |
52% |
144 |
18 |
11 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
276 |
Delmage, Jon |
(-225) |
104 |
104 |
|
Purdue |
62% |
145 |
20 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
416 |
Delmage, Luca |
(-112) |
80 |
80 |
|
Baylor |
60% |
140 |
24 |
8 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
81 |
Delmage, Mia |
(+36) |
126 |
126 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
140 |
20 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
28t |
Delmage, Michael |
(+14) |
137 |
137 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
140 |
21 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
28t |
Delmage, Natalie |
(+14) |
137 |
137 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
140 |
23 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
442t |
Demello Chris |
(-66) |
76 |
76 |
|
Houston |
56% |
135 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
359 |
DeMello, Griffin |
(-191) |
89 |
89 |
|
N. Carolina |
63% |
147 |
23 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
112 |
DeMello, Kristin 1 |
(+56) |
121 |
121 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
138 |
19 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
122t |
DeMello, Kristin 2 |
(+60) |
120 |
120 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
147 |
22 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
445 |
Demello,Chris |
(-69) |
76 |
76 |
|
Tennessee |
54% |
142 |
18 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
19 |
DesRoches, Stephen (1) |
(+11) |
139 |
139 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
140 |
23 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
264 |
DesRoches, Stephen (2) |
(-222) |
105 |
105 |
|
Purdue |
62% |
140 |
21 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
615t |
DesRoches, Stephen (3) |
(-1) |
54 |
54 |
|
Marquette |
56% |
140 |
22 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
39 |
Desrosiers, Jim -1 |
(+12) |
136 |
136 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
164 |
18 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
153 |
Desrosiers, Jim -2 |
(+79) |
116 |
116 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
156 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
217 |
Dev, Karanth |
(+121) |
110 |
110 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
133 |
22 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
88 |
Devine, William |
(+36) |
125 |
125 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
158 |
21 |
14 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
689 |
Dias, Grace |
(-1) |
36 |
36 |
|
Houston |
46% |
146 |
22 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
576 |
Dias, Izzy |
(-4) |
58 |
58 |
|
Iowa St |
40% |
146 |
14 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
558 |
Dias, Jeff |
(-10) |
61 |
61 |
|
Arizona |
52% |
146 |
19 |
9 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
322 |
Dias, Mitch |
(+183) |
97 |
97 |
|
Connecticut |
51% |
146 |
19 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
121 |
Dias, Rachel |
(+61) |
120 |
120 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
146 |
20 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
520 |
Dias, Robbie |
(-15) |
65 |
65 |
|
Gonzaga |
62% |
146 |
25 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
18 |
Dias, Walter |
(+3) |
140 |
140 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
87 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
YES! |
325 |
Dias, Walter 2 |
(+180) |
97 |
97 |
|
Connecticut |
52% |
78 |
21 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
505 |
Dias,Joyce#1 |
(-28) |
68 |
68 |
|
Houston |
56% |
102 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
683 |
Dias,Joyce#2 |
(-1) |
39 |
39 |
|
N. Carolina |
49% |
121 |
23 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
451 |
DiMento, Vincent |
(-57) |
75 |
75 |
|
Purdue |
57% |
142 |
21 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
145 |
DiMento, Vincent 2 |
(+71) |
117 |
117 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
148 |
19 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
314 |
Dour, Erica 1 |
(+175) |
99 |
99 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
152 |
23 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
187t |
Dowling, Blake |
(+100) |
113 |
113 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
152 |
23 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
487 |
Dowling, Blake 2 |
(-37) |
70 |
70 |
|
Marquette |
49% |
152 |
18 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
5 |
Dowling, Blake 3 |
(+2) |
144 |
144 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
144 |
22 |
9 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
YES! |
573 |
Dowling, Cayden |
(-1) |
58 |
58 |
|
Kentucky |
57% |
140 |
22 |
10 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
552t |
Dowling, Cayden 2 |
(-4) |
61 |
61 |
|
Iowa St |
57% |
135 |
23 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
140t |
Dowling, Cayden 3 |
(+76) |
117 |
117 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
140 |
21 |
8 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
615t |
Dowling, Patrick 1 |
(-1) |
54 |
54 |
|
Illinois |
48% |
140 |
18 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
31 |
Dowling, Patrick 2 |
(+11) |
137 |
137 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
146 |
21 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
516 |
Dowling, Patrick 3 |
(-11) |
65 |
65 |
|
Houston |
59% |
130 |
23 |
9 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
652 |
Dowling, Patrick 4 |
(-1) |
49 |
49 |
|
Auburn |
48% |
140 |
19 |
7 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
337t |
Dowse, Hunter |
(-206) |
92 |
92 |
|
Arizona |
65% |
140 |
22 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
562t |
Dowse, Hunter 2 |
(-4) |
60 |
60 |
|
Auburn |
56% |
134 |
20 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
173t |
Dowse, Hunter 3 |
(+93) |
114 |
114 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
146 |
20 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
590 |
Dufresne |
(-7) |
57 |
57 |
|
Iowa St |
51% |
149 |
19 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
207 |
Dufresne, Mark |
(-197) |
111 |
111 |
|
Purdue |
67% |
145 |
21 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
637 |
Dufresne, Mark 2 |
(-7) |
52 |
52 |
|
Houston |
54% |
147 |
20 |
12 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
538 |
D’Elia David |
(-12) |
63 |
63 |
|
N. Carolina |
56% |
148 |
21 |
9 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
468 |
D’Elia David 2 |
(-55) |
73 |
73 |
|
N. Carolina |
60% |
150 |
21 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
515 |
Faial |
(-17) |
66 |
66 |
|
Houston |
59% |
203 |
22 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
190 |
Faial, Joe 2 |
(+97) |
113 |
113 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
213 |
23 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
671 |
faial, Joe 3 |
(-6) |
46 |
46 |
|
Houston |
49% |
197 |
20 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
292 |
Falcone, Adam 1 |
(+158) |
102 |
102 |
|
Connecticut |
54% |
148 |
20 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
288 |
Falcone, Adam 2 |
(+162) |
102 |
102 |
|
Connecticut |
54% |
136 |
20 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
122t |
Falcone, Adam 3 |
(+60) |
120 |
120 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
123 |
20 |
14 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
444 |
Faria, Kevin 1 |
(-68) |
76 |
76 |
|
Houston |
62% |
140 |
22 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
500 |
Faria, Kevin 2 |
(-23) |
68 |
68 |
|
Arizona |
60% |
140 |
22 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
90t |
Faria, Kevin 3 |
(+41) |
124 |
124 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
140 |
22 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
337t |
Faria, Kevin 4 |
(-206) |
92 |
92 |
|
Purdue |
63% |
140 |
22 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
437 |
FENTON,DAN |
(-79) |
77 |
77 |
|
Houston |
57% |
140 |
21 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
605 |
Fernandes Henry |
(-12) |
56 |
56 |
|
Tennessee |
54% |
162 |
20 |
10 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
21 |
Fernandes Michael |
(+9) |
139 |
139 |
|
Connecticut |
73% |
152 |
25 |
11 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
YES! |
551 |
Ferrara, Amanda |
(-10) |
62 |
62 |
|
Marquette |
48% |
151 |
20 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
422 |
Ferrara, Danny |
(-98) |
79 |
79 |
|
Duke |
56% |
151 |
19 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
596 |
Fisher, Brandon |
(-3) |
56 |
56 |
|
Houston |
56% |
143 |
22 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
406 |
Fitts, Matt |
(-140) |
82 |
82 |
|
N. Carolina |
59% |
153 |
22 |
10 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
180t |
Fluette, Ray |
(+107) |
113 |
113 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
138 |
19 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
369 |
Flynn, Sara |
(-174) |
87 |
87 |
|
Iowa St |
63% |
156 |
21 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
600 |
Flynn, Sara 2 |
(-7) |
56 |
56 |
|
Arizona |
57% |
150 |
22 |
11 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
521t |
Flynn, Sara 3 |
(-16) |
65 |
65 |
|
Iowa St |
62% |
150 |
23 |
13 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
430 |
Franke, jason |
(-92) |
78 |
78 |
|
Iowa St |
57% |
139 |
20 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
285 |
Freddy contrer |
(+152) |
103 |
103 |
|
Connecticut |
51% |
121 |
17 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
320 |
Freddy contreras |
(+185) |
97 |
97 |
|
Connecticut |
44% |
131 |
15 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
627 |
Furtado, Joe 1 |
(-5) |
53 |
53 |
|
Iowa St |
57% |
162 |
23 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
212t |
Furtado, Joe 2 |
(+112) |
111 |
111 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
169 |
19 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
687 |
Furtado, Joe 3 |
(-1) |
37 |
37 |
|
N. Carolina |
44% |
169 |
19 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
238 |
Furtado, Joe 4 |
(+120) |
109 |
109 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
169 |
19 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
164 |
GAM1 |
(+82) |
115 |
115 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
160 |
21 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
12 |
GAM2 |
(+4) |
141 |
141 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
165 |
23 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
309t |
Gendron, Scott |
(-224) |
99 |
99 |
|
Marquette |
71% |
135 |
25 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
599 |
Goldberger, Danny #1 |
(-6) |
56 |
56 |
|
N. Carolina |
57% |
146 |
22 |
11 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
208 |
Goldberger, Danny #2 |
(-198) |
111 |
111 |
|
Purdue |
68% |
146 |
23 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
219t |
Goldberger, Danny #3 |
(+119) |
110 |
110 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
142 |
22 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
666t |
Goldberger, Danny #4 |
(-1) |
46 |
46 |
|
Baylor |
48% |
146 |
18 |
10 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
673 |
Goldberger, Danny #5 |
(-1) |
45 |
45 |
|
N. Carolina |
52% |
152 |
23 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
455 |
Goldberger, Lucas #1 |
(-61) |
75 |
75 |
|
Arizona |
60% |
165 |
19 |
14 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
376 |
Goldberger, Lucas #2 |
(-171) |
86 |
86 |
|
Purdue |
63% |
165 |
24 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
510 |
Goldberger, Lucas #3 |
(-21) |
67 |
67 |
|
N. Carolina |
59% |
165 |
21 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
40 |
Goldberger, Lucas #4 |
(+11) |
136 |
136 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
165 |
20 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
441 |
Goldberger, Lucas #5 |
(-83) |
77 |
77 |
|
Purdue |
59% |
165 |
21 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
646 |
Goldberger, Mike #1 |
(-3) |
51 |
51 |
|
Tennessee |
51% |
146 |
19 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
381 |
Goldberger, Mike #2 |
(-165) |
85 |
85 |
|
Purdue |
62% |
146 |
21 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
635t |
Goldberger, Mike #3 |
(-5) |
52 |
52 |
|
Houston |
48% |
146 |
18 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
588t |
Goldberger, Mike #4 |
(-5) |
57 |
57 |
|
Auburn |
56% |
146 |
23 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
485t |
Goldberger, Mike #5 |
(-35) |
70 |
70 |
|
Kentucky |
60% |
146 |
20 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
588t |
Goldberger, Steven #1 |
(-5) |
57 |
57 |
|
Houston |
51% |
146 |
17 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
439 |
Goldberger, Steven #2 |
(-81) |
77 |
77 |
|
Tennessee |
68% |
146 |
25 |
12 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
635t |
Goldberger, Steven #3 |
(-5) |
52 |
52 |
|
Marquette |
52% |
146 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
1 |
Goldberger, Steven #4 |
(+2) |
150 |
150 |
|
Connecticut |
73% |
146 |
22 |
14 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
485t |
Goldberger, Steven #5 |
(-35) |
70 |
70 |
|
Houston |
51% |
146 |
18 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
169 |
GoogsLenny01 |
(+97) |
114 |
114 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
130 |
24 |
9 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
614 |
GoogsLenny02 |
(-7) |
55 |
55 |
|
Houston |
57% |
180 |
21 |
13 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
608 |
Grandma #1 |
(-1) |
55 |
55 |
|
Houston |
49% |
133 |
19 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
70 |
Grandma #2 |
(+30) |
129 |
129 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
144 |
21 |
10 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
572 |
Gray, Cheryl 1 |
(-6) |
59 |
59 |
|
Florida |
56% |
178 |
23 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
384 |
Gray, Cheryl 2 |
(-168) |
85 |
85 |
|
Purdue |
63% |
182 |
23 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
46t |
Greg Charles |
(+23) |
134 |
134 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
128 |
20 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
481 |
Griffin, Matt |
(-44) |
71 |
71 |
|
N. Carolina |
52% |
168 |
19 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
434 |
Griffin, Porter |
(-96) |
78 |
78 |
|
Houston |
56% |
156 |
20 |
9 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
488 |
Griffin, Shelley |
(-38) |
70 |
70 |
|
Houston |
57% |
168 |
20 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
390t |
Grifka, Jeff |
(-144) |
83 |
83 |
|
Purdue |
60% |
137 |
23 |
10 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
73 |
Guglielmi, Lenny 1 |
(+37) |
127 |
127 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
125 |
21 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
431 |
Guglielmi, Lenny 2 |
(-93) |
78 |
78 |
|
Duke |
63% |
130 |
22 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
204t |
Guglielmi, Lenny 3 |
(-194) |
111 |
111 |
|
Purdue |
67% |
130 |
21 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
107 |
Hablewitz, Cole |
(+47) |
122 |
122 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
152 |
22 |
14 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
389 |
Hablewitz, Rookie |
(-157) |
84 |
84 |
|
Tennessee |
62% |
155 |
22 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
393t |
Hablewitz, Tom |
(-147) |
83 |
83 |
|
Houston |
59% |
141 |
21 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
177 |
Hancock, Anna |
(+89) |
114 |
114 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
154 |
24 |
13 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
131 |
Hancock, Jason |
(+64) |
119 |
119 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
145 |
23 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
661 |
Hancock, Jason 2 |
NC (0) |
47 |
47 |
|
N. Carolina |
54% |
139 |
23 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
547t |
Hancock, Jason 3 |
(-6) |
62 |
62 |
|
Houston |
60% |
140 |
22 |
12 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
253 |
Hancock, Jason 4 |
(+141) |
107 |
107 |
|
Connecticut |
54% |
138 |
17 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
147 |
Hancock, Jody |
(+69) |
117 |
117 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
165 |
23 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
38 |
Hancock, Lucy |
(+13) |
136 |
136 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
163 |
20 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
240 |
Harness Justice |
(+118) |
109 |
109 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
2 |
21 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
324 |
Harness, Kevin |
(-224) |
97 |
97 |
|
Purdue |
57% |
164 |
19 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
42 |
Harness, Kevin 2 |
(+18) |
135 |
135 |
|
Connecticut |
75% |
150 |
25 |
13 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
215 |
Harness, Kristina |
(+109) |
111 |
111 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
89 |
23 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
274t |
Harrington, corey |
(+155) |
104 |
104 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
143 |
22 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
404 |
Haynes Gram1 |
(-138) |
82 |
82 |
|
Kentucky |
59% |
143 |
22 |
10 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
628 |
Haynes Gram2 |
(-6) |
53 |
53 |
|
Houston |
51% |
164 |
21 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
496 |
Haynes Papa1 |
(-35) |
69 |
69 |
|
Houston |
49% |
158 |
19 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
202 |
Haynes Papa2 |
(+102) |
112 |
112 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
168 |
20 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
7 |
Haynes, Corey |
NC (0) |
144 |
144 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
181 |
20 |
12 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
622 |
Haynes, Corey 2 |
(-8) |
54 |
54 |
|
N. Carolina |
59% |
187 |
24 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
531 |
Haynes, Corey 3 |
(-13) |
64 |
64 |
|
Arizona |
59% |
148 |
22 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
212t |
Haynes, Cyndi |
(+112) |
111 |
111 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
169 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
300 |
Haynes, Fisher 1 |
(+177) |
100 |
100 |
|
Connecticut |
51% |
141 |
18 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
650 |
Haynes, Fisher 2 |
NC (0) |
50 |
50 |
|
Tennessee |
41% |
141 |
14 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
393t |
Haynes, Fisher 3 |
(-147) |
83 |
83 |
|
Arizona |
62% |
141 |
23 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
549 |
Haynes, Fisher 4 |
(-8) |
62 |
62 |
|
Auburn |
65% |
141 |
26 |
12 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
617t |
Haynes, Gavin |
(-3) |
54 |
54 |
|
Illinois |
56% |
150 |
22 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
474 |
Haynes, Gavin 2 |
(-45) |
72 |
72 |
|
Texas Tech |
52% |
145 |
20 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
529t |
Haynes, Jennifer 1 |
(-11) |
64 |
64 |
|
Arizona |
56% |
146 |
20 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
43 |
Haynes, Sean 1 |
(+17) |
135 |
135 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
154 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
268 |
Haynes, Sean 2 |
(-226) |
105 |
105 |
|
Purdue |
63% |
150 |
21 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
10t |
Haynes, Sean 3 |
(+6) |
141 |
141 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
156 |
23 |
9 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
316t |
Haynes, Sean 4 |
(-223) |
98 |
98 |
|
Purdue |
70% |
145 |
24 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
458 |
Herchenroether, Daniel1 |
(-54) |
74 |
74 |
|
Arizona |
48% |
141 |
16 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
517 |
herchenroether, daniel2 |
(-12) |
65 |
65 |
|
Purdue |
48% |
141 |
19 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
662 |
herchenroether, daniel3 |
(-1) |
47 |
47 |
|
Houston |
48% |
141 |
17 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
417t |
Higgins, Brooke |
(-113) |
80 |
80 |
|
Purdue |
57% |
143 |
22 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
678 |
Ho Linh |
NC (0) |
42 |
42 |
|
Iowa St |
48% |
132 |
20 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
104 |
Horn, Joseph |
(+50) |
122 |
122 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
134 |
22 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
150 |
Howard Gary 1 |
(+82) |
116 |
116 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
144 |
20 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
361 |
Howard, Haley |
(-193) |
89 |
89 |
|
Gonzaga |
62% |
152 |
23 |
9 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
168 |
Howard, Ken 2 |
(+98) |
114 |
114 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
138 |
22 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
371 |
Howard, Ken 3 |
(-166) |
86 |
86 |
|
N. Carolina |
59% |
142 |
20 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
143t |
Howard, Ken 4 |
(+73) |
117 |
117 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
144 |
19 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
15 |
Howard, Ken1 |
(+6) |
140 |
140 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
147 |
20 |
14 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
525 |
Huston, Andre |
(-7) |
64 |
64 |
|
Auburn |
57% |
134 |
20 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
365 |
Huston, Andre 2 |
(-183) |
88 |
88 |
|
Arizona |
63% |
159 |
22 |
13 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
372t |
Huston, Andre 3 |
(-167) |
86 |
86 |
|
Marquette |
57% |
145 |
18 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
321 |
Huston, Andre 4 |
(-221) |
97 |
97 |
|
Duke |
65% |
145 |
21 |
12 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
453 |
Huston, Andre 5 |
(-59) |
75 |
75 |
|
Creighton |
57% |
146 |
21 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
170 |
James Moore |
(+96) |
114 |
114 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
127 |
20 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
228 |
James Moore 2 |
(+130) |
109 |
109 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
127 |
21 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
266t |
James Moore 3 |
(+147) |
105 |
105 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
145 |
21 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
328 |
James Moore 4 |
(-222) |
96 |
96 |
|
Purdue |
56% |
150 |
18 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
284 |
James Moore 5 |
(+153) |
103 |
103 |
|
Connecticut |
54% |
147 |
19 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
641 |
James, Joe |
(-11) |
52 |
52 |
|
Illinois |
52% |
156 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
670 |
Jay Spin |
(-5) |
46 |
46 |
|
Houston |
49% |
109 |
20 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
331 |
Jensen 1, Alex |
(-221) |
95 |
95 |
|
Purdue |
57% |
146 |
21 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
4 |
Jensen 2, Alex |
(+2) |
146 |
146 |
|
Connecticut |
73% |
146 |
24 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
643 |
Jensen, Blake |
NC (0) |
51 |
51 |
|
N. Carolina |
48% |
135 |
19 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
101 |
JJK |
(+42) |
123 |
123 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
154 |
23 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
309t |
Joglekar, Vikram – MC Ragweed |
(+180) |
99 |
99 |
|
Connecticut |
49% |
135 |
17 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
259 |
Kane, Brian 1 |
(+135) |
107 |
107 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
167 |
21 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
127 |
Kane, Brian 2 |
(+55) |
120 |
120 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
183 |
22 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
37 |
Kane,Brian |
(+14) |
136 |
136 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
158 |
20 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
179 |
Karanth, Dee |
(+108) |
113 |
113 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
135 |
19 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
84 |
Karanth, Dee-2 |
(+40) |
125 |
125 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
140 |
21 |
14 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
299 |
Karanth, Dee-3 |
(+162) |
101 |
101 |
|
Connecticut |
51% |
157 |
19 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
211 |
Karanth, Dee-4 |
(-201) |
111 |
111 |
|
Purdue |
68% |
155 |
23 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
623 |
Karanth, Dev |
(-1) |
53 |
53 |
|
Houston |
52% |
136 |
19 |
11 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
582 |
Karanth, Nik1 |
(-10) |
58 |
58 |
|
Kentucky |
57% |
155 |
24 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
146 |
Karanth,Nik2 |
(+70) |
117 |
117 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
155 |
21 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
611 |
Kayden Rutland |
(-4) |
55 |
55 |
|
N. Carolina |
54% |
142 |
21 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
344 |
Kayden Rutland 2 |
(-201) |
91 |
91 |
|
Kentucky |
73% |
137 |
27 |
14 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
497 |
Kayden Rutland 3 |
(-36) |
69 |
69 |
|
Kentucky |
52% |
161 |
21 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
167 |
kelly,john 1 |
(+99) |
114 |
114 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
137 |
26 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
607 |
Kemmerer,Jon #1 |
(-14) |
56 |
56 |
|
Houston |
57% |
87 |
22 |
11 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
61 |
Kielman, Deb 1 |
(+24) |
131 |
131 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
113 |
21 |
9 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
293 |
Kielman, Deb 2 |
(+157) |
102 |
102 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
119 |
22 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
552t |
King, Kaleb |
(-4) |
61 |
61 |
|
Arizona |
62% |
135 |
25 |
10 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
356 |
King, Kristen |
(-188) |
89 |
89 |
|
Duke |
59% |
133 |
19 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
193t |
King, Kristen 2 |
(+111) |
112 |
112 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
139 |
20 |
10 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
438 |
King, Mike |
(-80) |
77 |
77 |
|
Houston |
56% |
129 |
19 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
351 |
King, Mike 2 |
(-197) |
90 |
90 |
|
Purdue |
60% |
140 |
20 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
375 |
KKJ |
(-170) |
86 |
86 |
|
Kentucky |
57% |
159 |
20 |
9 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
354 |
KKR |
(-200) |
90 |
90 |
|
Duke |
65% |
148 |
22 |
12 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
94 |
Klaassen Jordan |
(+37) |
124 |
124 |
|
Connecticut |
54% |
145 |
18 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
598 |
Klaassen Jordan 2 |
(-5) |
56 |
56 |
|
N. Carolina |
52% |
145 |
20 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
302 |
Klaassen Jordan 3 |
(-224) |
100 |
100 |
|
Purdue |
59% |
145 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
691 |
Klaassen Jordan 4 |
NC (0) |
31 |
31 |
|
Auburn |
35% |
145 |
15 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
379 |
Klaassen, Justin 1 |
(-163) |
85 |
85 |
|
Houston |
62% |
141 |
21 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
182t |
Klaassen, Justin 2 |
(+105) |
113 |
113 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
142 |
21 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
280 |
Klaassen, Justin 3 |
(-220) |
103 |
103 |
|
Purdue |
62% |
141 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
529t |
Knight, Ben |
(-11) |
64 |
64 |
|
Houston |
65% |
146 |
24 |
14 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
160 |
Knight, Brett |
(+86) |
115 |
115 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
145 |
21 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
245 |
Knight, Brody |
(+131) |
108 |
108 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
146 |
20 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
255t |
Knight, Kate |
(-225) |
107 |
107 |
|
Purdue |
65% |
146 |
21 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
180t |
Komiega, David |
(+107) |
113 |
113 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
138 |
21 |
8 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
312 |
Komiega, David 2 |
(-227) |
99 |
99 |
|
Purdue |
57% |
141 |
19 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
386 |
Komiega, David 3 |
(-154) |
84 |
84 |
|
Houston |
57% |
142 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
385 |
Komiega, Sarah |
(-153) |
84 |
84 |
|
Purdue |
59% |
131 |
20 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
402 |
Komiega,David 4 |
(-136) |
82 |
82 |
|
Houston |
60% |
140 |
22 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
489 |
Komiega,David 5 |
(-28) |
69 |
69 |
|
Tennessee |
63% |
140 |
23 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
609t |
Komiega,David 6 |
(-2) |
55 |
55 |
|
Houston |
54% |
140 |
19 |
12 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
565 |
Komorowski, Mike 2 |
(-7) |
60 |
60 |
|
N. Carolina |
57% |
118 |
20 |
12 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
382 |
Komorowski, Mike 3 |
(-166) |
85 |
85 |
|
Arizona |
59% |
122 |
21 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
178 |
Komorowski, Mike 4 |
(+88) |
114 |
114 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
112 |
22 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
173t |
Komorowskii, Mike 1 |
(+93) |
114 |
114 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
124 |
22 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
27 |
Konkle, Gwen |
(+11) |
138 |
138 |
|
Connecticut |
75% |
200 |
24 |
13 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
17 |
Konkle, James 1 |
(+4) |
140 |
140 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
165 |
22 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
677 |
Konkle, James 2 |
(-2) |
44 |
44 |
|
Illinois |
46% |
170 |
18 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
408 |
Konkle, James 3 |
(-142) |
82 |
82 |
|
Purdue |
60% |
174 |
24 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
685 |
Konkle, James 4 |
(-3) |
39 |
39 |
|
Arizona |
49% |
170 |
23 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
399 |
Konkle, Stella |
(-153) |
83 |
83 |
|
Tennessee |
60% |
170 |
21 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
478 |
Landeo, Jorge |
(-41) |
71 |
71 |
|
Creighton |
62% |
115 |
21 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
446t |
langlois ,beth |
(-70) |
76 |
76 |
|
Purdue |
52% |
126 |
20 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
226 |
Langlois, Jeff 1 |
(+112) |
110 |
110 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
170 |
22 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
544t |
Langlois, Jeff 2 |
(-18) |
63 |
63 |
|
Kentucky |
57% |
170 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
669 |
Langlois, Jeff 3 |
(-4) |
46 |
46 |
|
Marquette |
51% |
155 |
22 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
105 |
Langlois, Jeff 4 |
(+49) |
122 |
122 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
145 |
22 |
12 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
161 |
Langlois,Beth |
(+85) |
115 |
115 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
120 |
19 |
8 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
109t |
LAPERCHE RHONDA #1 |
(+45) |
122 |
122 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
157 |
20 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
44 |
LAPERCHE RHONDA 2 |
(+16) |
135 |
135 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
157 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
196 |
LaPrade, C |
(+108) |
112 |
112 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
123 |
24 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
470 |
LaPrade, Chase |
(-57) |
73 |
73 |
|
Arizona |
57% |
168 |
21 |
8 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
59 |
LaPrade, Dan (1) |
(+26) |
131 |
131 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
154 |
21 |
9 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
642 |
LaPrade, Dan (2) |
(-12) |
52 |
52 |
|
N. Carolina |
56% |
168 |
22 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
306 |
LaPrade, Evan |
(+171) |
100 |
100 |
|
Connecticut |
49% |
151 |
18 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
664 |
LaPrade, Tim#1 |
(-3) |
47 |
47 |
|
Arizona |
51% |
156 |
21 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
132 |
LaPrade, Tim#2 |
(+63) |
119 |
119 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
153 |
19 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
239 |
Lashua Craig |
(+119) |
109 |
109 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
179 |
17 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
23 |
Lashua, Craig |
(+7) |
139 |
139 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
178 |
23 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
203 |
Lashua, Craig 2 |
(+101) |
112 |
112 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
177 |
22 |
9 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
425 |
Lashua, Craig 3 |
(-101) |
79 |
79 |
|
Purdue |
62% |
175 |
23 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
197 |
Lau, Kimberly |
(+107) |
112 |
112 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
151 |
22 |
9 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
78 |
Lauren Moore |
(+39) |
126 |
126 |
|
Connecticut |
54% |
136 |
16 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
48 |
Lauren Moore 2 |
(+21) |
134 |
134 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
145 |
22 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
115 |
Laviano, Don |
(+53) |
121 |
121 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
153 |
23 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
366 |
Lavoie, Jason 1 |
(-171) |
87 |
87 |
|
Purdue |
65% |
132 |
23 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
135 |
Lavoie, Jason 2 |
(+70) |
118 |
118 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
132 |
20 |
7 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
YES! |
358 |
Lawlor, Amanda |
(-190) |
89 |
89 |
|
Purdue |
49% |
131 |
17 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
137 |
Lettenberger, Jason 1 |
(+68) |
118 |
118 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
150 |
22 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
116 |
Lettenberger, Jason 2 |
(+52) |
121 |
121 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
155 |
21 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
130 |
Lindsay, Todd |
(+65) |
119 |
119 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
126 |
23 |
14 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
154 |
Louie, Mad 1 |
(+78) |
116 |
116 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
162 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
138 |
MacArthur, John |
(+67) |
118 |
118 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
112 |
22 |
8 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
166 |
MacArthur, Maggie |
(+80) |
115 |
115 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
171 |
23 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
279 |
Manijak, Matt |
(-219) |
103 |
103 |
|
Purdue |
60% |
135 |
19 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
329 |
Margaret Howard |
(+197) |
95 |
95 |
|
Connecticut |
44% |
139 |
15 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
295 |
margaret howard 2 |
(+166) |
101 |
101 |
|
Connecticut |
51% |
143 |
17 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
640 |
Mary Manijak |
(-10) |
52 |
52 |
|
Auburn |
52% |
154 |
22 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
25t |
matthew rego |
(+13) |
138 |
138 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
158 |
22 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
133 |
matthew rego 2 |
(-131) |
119 |
119 |
|
Purdue |
70% |
155 |
23 |
12 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
NO |
257 |
matthew rego 3 |
(+137) |
107 |
107 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
155 |
21 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
400t |
matthew rego 4 |
(-134) |
82 |
82 |
|
Houston |
60% |
132 |
22 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
232t |
matthew rego 5 |
(-216) |
109 |
109 |
|
Purdue |
63% |
153 |
21 |
10 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
278 |
matthew rego 6 |
(+151) |
104 |
104 |
|
Connecticut |
49% |
158 |
18 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
415 |
matthew rego 7 |
(-111) |
80 |
80 |
|
Houston |
70% |
138 |
24 |
14 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
87 |
Mattos, David |
(-86) |
125 |
125 |
|
Purdue |
73% |
154 |
23 |
13 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
NO |
10t |
Mattos, David 1 |
(+6) |
141 |
141 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
156 |
23 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
290 |
McClain, Dean |
(+160) |
102 |
102 |
|
Connecticut |
49% |
142 |
16 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
423 |
McClain, Derek - 1 |
(-99) |
79 |
79 |
|
Purdue |
57% |
155 |
19 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
364 |
McClain, Derek - 2 |
(-182) |
88 |
88 |
|
Houston |
62% |
157 |
22 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
475 |
McClain, Derek - 3 |
(-46) |
72 |
72 |
|
Purdue |
52% |
156 |
18 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
294 |
McClain, Jimmy - 1 |
(+167) |
101 |
101 |
|
Connecticut |
54% |
138 |
19 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
124t |
McClain, Jimmy - 2 |
(+58) |
120 |
120 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
148 |
22 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
204t |
McGovern,Maeve |
(-194) |
111 |
111 |
|
Purdue |
67% |
140 |
21 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
50 |
McInerney, Jo 2 |
(+19) |
134 |
134 |
|
Connecticut |
73% |
152 |
24 |
13 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
3 |
McInerney, Jo-1 |
(+1) |
147 |
147 |
|
Connecticut |
75% |
155 |
25 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
679 |
McKenna, Ken 1 |
NC (0) |
41 |
41 |
|
N. Carolina |
48% |
138 |
21 |
8 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
512 |
McKenna, Ken 2 |
(-14) |
66 |
66 |
|
James Mad |
49% |
128 |
20 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
534t |
Mcmullen, Kely |
(-8) |
63 |
63 |
|
Creighton |
60% |
142 |
23 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
273 |
McMullen, Matt |
(+156) |
104 |
104 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
142 |
24 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
518 |
Mcmullen, matt 2 |
(-13) |
65 |
65 |
|
Houston |
63% |
142 |
23 |
13 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
265 |
Mcmullen, Matt 3 |
(+148) |
105 |
105 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
142 |
23 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
24 |
MDK#1 |
(+14) |
138 |
138 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
153 |
22 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
33 |
MDK#2 |
(+9) |
137 |
137 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
170 |
19 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
362 |
Merriam,Rick |
(-180) |
88 |
88 |
|
Arizona |
62% |
130 |
20 |
14 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
158 |
Mesolella 2, Nick |
(+88) |
115 |
115 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
127 |
25 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
585t |
Mesolella 3, Nick |
(-2) |
57 |
57 |
|
Duke |
57% |
127 |
21 |
12 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
492 |
Mesolella, Nick |
(-31) |
69 |
69 |
|
Arizona |
60% |
127 |
21 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
55 |
Meunier, Steve 1 |
(+23) |
132 |
132 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
141 |
22 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
513 |
Meunier, Steve 2 |
(-15) |
66 |
66 |
|
Houston |
56% |
145 |
20 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
93 |
Meunier, Steve 3 |
(+38) |
124 |
124 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
143 |
22 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
45 |
Michael, DiRuzzo |
(+15) |
135 |
135 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
167 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
224t |
Moeller, Brad #1 |
(+114) |
110 |
110 |
|
Connecticut |
54% |
150 |
18 |
10 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
617t |
Moeller, Brad #2 |
(-3) |
54 |
54 |
|
Houston |
52% |
150 |
22 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
260 |
Moeller, Carly |
(+144) |
106 |
106 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
147 |
22 |
12 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
83 |
Moeller,Lyla |
(+34) |
126 |
126 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
155 |
22 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
56 |
Monahan, Michael |
(+22) |
132 |
132 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
144 |
24 |
8 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
149 |
Moon, Mary |
(+83) |
116 |
116 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
132 |
24 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
90t |
Moon,Dominic |
(+41) |
124 |
124 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
140 |
22 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
246t |
Moon,Ken1 |
(+130) |
108 |
108 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
150 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
490t |
Moon,Ken2 |
(-29) |
69 |
69 |
|
N. Carolina |
67% |
142 |
25 |
14 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
409 |
Moon,Vito |
(-122) |
81 |
81 |
|
N. Carolina |
67% |
140 |
23 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
526 |
Moscardelli, Katie |
(-8) |
64 |
64 |
|
Florida |
46% |
132 |
18 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
143t |
Muir, Jeff 1 |
(+73) |
117 |
117 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
144 |
19 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
502 |
Muir, Jeff 2 |
(-25) |
68 |
68 |
|
Arizona |
54% |
144 |
18 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
554t |
Muir, Jeff 3 |
(-6) |
61 |
61 |
|
Iowa St |
54% |
144 |
19 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
587 |
Muir, Jeff 4 |
(-4) |
57 |
57 |
|
Auburn |
52% |
144 |
19 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
465t |
Muir, Jeff 5 |
(-52) |
73 |
73 |
|
Creighton |
54% |
144 |
19 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
175 |
Mullen, Bobby |
(+91) |
114 |
114 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
147 |
20 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
504 |
Mullen, Stephen (1) |
(-27) |
68 |
68 |
|
Houston |
52% |
153 |
20 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
620 |
Mullen, Stephen (2) |
(-6) |
54 |
54 |
|
Auburn |
57% |
159 |
22 |
12 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
666t |
Mullen, Stephen (3) |
(-1) |
46 |
46 |
|
Houston |
49% |
146 |
20 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
448 |
Mullen, Stephen (4) |
(-72) |
76 |
76 |
|
Auburn |
56% |
147 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
230 |
Muller, Eric |
(+128) |
109 |
109 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
148 |
23 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
227 |
Muller, Eric 1 |
(+131) |
109 |
109 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
138 |
21 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
577 |
Muller, Eric 2 |
(-5) |
58 |
58 |
|
Houston |
51% |
121 |
20 |
7 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
313 |
Muller, Eric 3 |
(-228) |
99 |
99 |
|
Purdue |
56% |
144 |
19 |
8 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
326 |
Muller, Eric 4 |
(-220) |
96 |
96 |
|
Purdue |
68% |
134 |
24 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
624 |
Nencka Thomas |
(-2) |
53 |
53 |
|
Illinois |
51% |
140 |
19 |
9 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
270 |
Nickolenko, Abby |
(+143) |
105 |
105 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
78 |
23 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
191 |
Nickolenko, Brian 1 |
(+113) |
112 |
112 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
135 |
20 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
428t |
Nickolenko, Brian 2 |
(-90) |
78 |
78 |
|
Houston |
63% |
132 |
24 |
13 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
562t |
Nickolenko, Brian 3 |
(-4) |
60 |
60 |
|
N. Carolina |
60% |
136 |
22 |
13 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
224t |
Nickolenko, Kim |
(+114) |
110 |
110 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
150 |
24 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
251 |
Nickolenko, Tyler |
(-230) |
108 |
108 |
|
Purdue |
65% |
160 |
22 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
355 |
Nigri, Lauren |
(-201) |
90 |
90 |
|
Florida |
62% |
175 |
22 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
129 |
OFlaherty,Tim |
(+66) |
119 |
119 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
134 |
21 |
11 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
64 |
OLSON, SCOTT 1 |
(+29) |
130 |
130 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
150 |
18 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
595 |
OLSON, SCOTT 2 |
(-2) |
56 |
56 |
|
Houston |
60% |
140 |
26 |
9 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
350 |
OLSON, SCOTT 3 |
(-196) |
90 |
90 |
|
Houston |
65% |
138 |
24 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
339 |
OLSON, SCOTT 4 |
(-208) |
92 |
92 |
|
Alabama |
62% |
145 |
22 |
9 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
109t |
Pacheco, Chris |
(+45) |
122 |
122 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
113 |
24 |
13 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
187t |
Pacheco, Chris1 |
(+100) |
113 |
113 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
118 |
19 |
9 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
450 |
Parikh, Arpan |
(-74) |
76 |
76 |
|
Creighton |
62% |
78 |
24 |
12 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
395 |
Parikh, Arpan 1 |
(-149) |
83 |
83 |
|
Gonzaga |
63% |
128 |
21 |
15 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
126 |
Pashoian, M 1 |
(+56) |
120 |
120 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
153 |
18 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
469 |
Pashoian, M 2 |
(-56) |
73 |
73 |
|
Arizona |
65% |
154 |
23 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
58 |
Pashoian, Sean 1 |
(+27) |
131 |
131 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
137 |
17 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
343 |
Pashoian, Sean 2 |
(-200) |
91 |
91 |
|
Purdue |
60% |
135 |
21 |
9 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
303 |
Pashoian, Sean 4 |
(+174) |
100 |
100 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
146 |
22 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
410 |
Pashoian, Sean, 3 |
(-123) |
81 |
81 |
|
Tennessee |
57% |
141 |
19 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
380 |
Pat K |
(-164) |
85 |
85 |
|
Houston |
56% |
127 |
19 |
9 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
52 |
Peecher, Kim |
(+17) |
134 |
134 |
|
Connecticut |
73% |
180 |
24 |
13 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
241 |
Perrucci,Paul |
(+135) |
108 |
108 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
133 |
20 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
199 |
Person, Kristin |
(+105) |
112 |
112 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
156 |
24 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
377 |
Peters, Matthew |
(-161) |
85 |
85 |
|
Kentucky |
60% |
134 |
21 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
417t |
Peters, Matthew 2 |
(-113) |
80 |
80 |
|
Houston |
56% |
127 |
18 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
413 |
Pitz, Luke |
(-126) |
81 |
81 |
|
Illinois |
59% |
165 |
21 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
462 |
Pitz, Luke_2 |
(-58) |
74 |
74 |
|
Arizona |
59% |
165 |
22 |
12 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
35 |
Porro, Matt 1 |
(+16) |
136 |
136 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
144 |
22 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
111 |
Porro, Matt NU |
(+57) |
121 |
121 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
137 |
21 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
51 |
Price, Tom |
(+18) |
134 |
134 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
168 |
22 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
442t |
Provost, Ron |
(-66) |
76 |
76 |
|
Creighton |
59% |
135 |
22 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
539t |
Provost, Ron 2 |
(-13) |
63 |
63 |
|
Colorado |
59% |
151 |
23 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
506 |
Provost, Ron 3 |
(-17) |
67 |
67 |
|
N. Carolina |
57% |
135 |
19 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
594 |
Rainey Chris |
(-1) |
56 |
56 |
|
Houston |
54% |
138 |
20 |
10 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
262 |
Rainey Chris 3 |
(+151) |
105 |
105 |
|
Connecticut |
54% |
138 |
19 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
139 |
Rainey Chris 4 |
(+77) |
117 |
117 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
138 |
19 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
651 |
Rainey Chris 5 |
NC (0) |
49 |
49 |
|
Iowa St |
52% |
138 |
21 |
10 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
507 |
Rainey Chris 6 |
(-18) |
67 |
67 |
|
Houston |
57% |
138 |
19 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
333 |
Rainey Chris1 |
(-216) |
94 |
94 |
|
Illinois |
62% |
138 |
20 |
11 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
242 |
Rainey Chris2 |
(+134) |
108 |
108 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
138 |
18 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
117 |
Ramsey, Mark |
(+51) |
121 |
121 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
156 |
21 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
157 |
Ray K |
(+89) |
115 |
115 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
134 |
23 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
140t |
Reis, Christine |
(+76) |
117 |
117 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
140 |
21 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
396t |
Reis, Christine 1 |
(-150) |
83 |
83 |
|
Houston |
59% |
145 |
19 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
676 |
Reis, Christine 2 |
(-1) |
44 |
44 |
|
Arizona |
41% |
155 |
14 |
9 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
223 |
Reis, Cliff |
(+115) |
110 |
110 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
126 |
20 |
13 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
612 |
Reis, Cliff 1 |
(-5) |
55 |
55 |
|
N. Carolina |
57% |
127 |
21 |
13 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
501 |
Reis, Cliff 2 |
(-24) |
68 |
68 |
|
Iowa St |
52% |
129 |
22 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
609t |
Reis, Cliff 3 |
(-2) |
55 |
55 |
|
Houston |
52% |
130 |
21 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
403 |
Reis, Cliff 4 |
(-137) |
82 |
82 |
|
Houston |
59% |
128 |
22 |
10 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
277 |
Reis, Leah |
(+152) |
104 |
104 |
|
Connecticut |
48% |
146 |
16 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
53 |
Reis, Mason |
(+23) |
133 |
133 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
154 |
17 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
236 |
Reis,Mason 1 |
(+122) |
109 |
109 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
156 |
21 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
663 |
Reis,Mason 2 |
(-2) |
47 |
47 |
|
N. Carolina |
49% |
143 |
19 |
10 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
16 |
Reitman, Rich |
(+5) |
140 |
140 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
158 |
22 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
231 |
richard howard |
(+127) |
109 |
109 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
149 |
19 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
97 |
Rizzy, cizzy |
(+34) |
124 |
124 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
179 |
22 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
584 |
Roberds, Gretchen |
(-1) |
57 |
57 |
|
Florida |
52% |
136 |
21 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
629 |
Roberds, Tom |
(-7) |
53 |
53 |
|
Florida |
49% |
98 |
19 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
68 |
Ross, Kyle |
(+32) |
129 |
129 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
136 |
21 |
8 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
266t |
Ross, Mark |
(+147) |
105 |
105 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
145 |
23 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
601 |
Ross, Mark 2 |
(-8) |
56 |
56 |
|
Arizona |
51% |
152 |
18 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
113t |
Ross, Meg |
(+55) |
121 |
121 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
143 |
23 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
519 |
RRK |
(-14) |
65 |
65 |
|
Houston |
59% |
143 |
21 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
653 |
Russell, Melanie |
(-2) |
49 |
49 |
|
N. Carolina |
54% |
141 |
23 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
85t |
Rutland, Kenya 1 |
(+39) |
125 |
125 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
144 |
21 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
219t |
Rutland, Kenya 2 |
(+119) |
110 |
110 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
142 |
22 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
80 |
Rutland, Kenya 3 |
(+37) |
126 |
126 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
131 |
22 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
318t |
Ryan M |
(+180) |
98 |
98 |
|
Connecticut |
52% |
151 |
20 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
219t |
Saldarriaga,Stephen |
(+119) |
110 |
110 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
128 |
20 |
9 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
128 |
Scarfo, Jason 1 |
(+67) |
119 |
119 |
|
Connecticut |
70% |
135 |
25 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
432 |
Scarfo, Jason 2 |
(-94) |
78 |
78 |
|
Kentucky |
60% |
143 |
22 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
357 |
Scarfo, Jason 3 |
(-189) |
89 |
89 |
|
Houston |
62% |
138 |
21 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
192 |
Scarfo, Jason 4 |
(+112) |
112 |
112 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
137 |
22 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
297 |
Schantz, Gigi |
(+164) |
101 |
101 |
|
Connecticut |
54% |
152 |
19 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
374 |
Schantz, Jax |
(-169) |
86 |
86 |
|
N. Carolina |
59% |
154 |
20 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
136 |
Schild, Brian 1 |
(+69) |
118 |
118 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
144 |
22 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
574t |
Schild, Brian 2 |
(-2) |
58 |
58 |
|
N. Carolina |
54% |
144 |
22 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
465t |
Schild, Brian 3 |
(-52) |
73 |
73 |
|
Houston |
56% |
144 |
21 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
85t |
Schild, Brian 4 |
(+39) |
125 |
125 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
144 |
21 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
301 |
Schild, Brian 5 |
(-223) |
100 |
100 |
|
Purdue |
59% |
144 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
387t |
Schild, Brian 6 |
(-155) |
84 |
84 |
|
Marquette |
57% |
144 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
367 |
Schild, Brian 7 |
(-172) |
87 |
87 |
|
N. Carolina |
60% |
144 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
631t |
Schild, Brian 8 |
(-1) |
52 |
52 |
|
N. Carolina |
52% |
144 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
567 |
Schultze, Carly |
(-9) |
60 |
60 |
|
Arizona |
54% |
94 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
152 |
Scott, Alexander “Sandy” |
(+80) |
116 |
116 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
148 |
22 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
521t |
Scott, Alexander “Sandy” 2 |
(-16) |
65 |
65 |
|
N. Carolina |
57% |
150 |
21 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
352t |
SeanP 1 |
(-198) |
90 |
90 |
|
N. Carolina |
62% |
144 |
22 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
32 |
SeanP 2 |
(+10) |
137 |
137 |
|
Connecticut |
71% |
147 |
23 |
13 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
YES! |
457 |
Sedor, Aidan |
(-53) |
74 |
74 |
|
Houston |
56% |
135 |
20 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
155 |
Sedor, Brian 1 |
(+77) |
116 |
116 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
163 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
106 |
Shearer, Adam |
(+48) |
122 |
122 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
151 |
22 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
318t |
Shearer,Adam |
(-225) |
98 |
98 |
|
Purdue |
56% |
151 |
18 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
74 |
Simoneau, Jay |
(+36) |
127 |
127 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
121 |
23 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
304 |
Simoneau, Jayme |
(+173) |
100 |
100 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
148 |
24 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
574t |
Smith, Elle |
(-2) |
58 |
58 |
|
New Mexico |
44% |
144 |
16 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
102 |
Smith, Evan |
(+41) |
123 |
123 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
165 |
21 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
480 |
Smith, Sean |
(-43) |
71 |
71 |
|
Tennessee |
49% |
162 |
17 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
272 |
Smith, Toni |
(-221) |
104 |
104 |
|
Creighton |
73% |
141 |
24 |
14 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
298 |
Snieg, Anne |
(+163) |
101 |
101 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
155 |
23 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
440 |
Snieg, Chris |
(-82) |
77 |
77 |
|
Arizona |
60% |
155 |
23 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
544t |
Snieg, Nik |
(-18) |
63 |
63 |
|
Arizona |
57% |
170 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
602t |
Snieg, Tom |
(-9) |
56 |
56 |
|
Arizona |
52% |
154 |
20 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
77 |
Snieg, Tom 1 |
(+33) |
127 |
127 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
153 |
19 |
10 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
255t |
Stach, Leslie |
(+139) |
107 |
107 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
146 |
21 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
398 |
Stachel, Bernard 2 |
(-152) |
83 |
83 |
|
Purdue |
63% |
155 |
23 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
28t |
Stachel, Bernard 3 |
(+14) |
137 |
137 |
|
Connecticut |
71% |
140 |
23 |
13 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
YES! |
435 |
Stachel, Bernard1 |
(-97) |
78 |
78 |
|
Arizona |
68% |
164 |
24 |
13 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
165 |
Stadtmiller, Francine 1 |
(+81) |
115 |
115 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
161 |
19 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
621 |
Stadtmiller, Francine 2 |
(-7) |
54 |
54 |
|
Kentucky |
44% |
161 |
16 |
7 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
323 |
Stadtmiller, Joe 1 |
(+182) |
97 |
97 |
|
Connecticut |
51% |
161 |
19 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
532 |
Stadtmiller, Joe 2 |
(-14) |
64 |
64 |
|
Duke |
54% |
161 |
22 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
134 |
Stadtmiller, Joe 3 |
(+61) |
119 |
119 |
|
Connecticut |
71% |
161 |
27 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
214 |
Stadtmiller, Jon |
(+110) |
111 |
111 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
172 |
21 |
13 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
252 |
Stadtmiller, Jon 2 |
(+124) |
108 |
108 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
176 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
659t |
Stadtmiller, Jon 3 |
(-2) |
48 |
48 |
|
Iowa St |
54% |
120 |
22 |
11 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
210 |
Stadtmiller, Sarah 1 |
(+114) |
111 |
111 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
148 |
21 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
186 |
Stadtmiller, Sarah 2 |
(+101) |
113 |
113 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
148 |
21 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
345 |
Stadtmiller, Sarah 3 |
(+221) |
91 |
91 |
|
Connecticut |
46% |
148 |
19 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
461 |
Steele, Alex |
(-57) |
74 |
74 |
|
Houston |
54% |
161 |
20 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
503 |
Steele, Alex 2 |
(-26) |
68 |
68 |
|
Creighton |
51% |
149 |
20 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
659t |
Steele, Alex 3 |
(-2) |
48 |
48 |
|
Arizona |
51% |
150 |
20 |
10 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
387t |
Steele, Alex 4 |
(-155) |
84 |
84 |
|
Iowa St |
57% |
144 |
20 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
578t |
Steele, Alex 5 |
(-6) |
58 |
58 |
|
N. Carolina |
57% |
151 |
20 |
13 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
316t |
Steele, Jeff 1 |
(+182) |
98 |
98 |
|
Connecticut |
51% |
145 |
18 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
296 |
Steele, Jeff 2 |
(-220) |
101 |
101 |
|
Baylor |
71% |
145 |
25 |
12 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
330 |
Steele, Jeff 3 |
(-220) |
95 |
95 |
|
Marquette |
63% |
145 |
21 |
11 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
283 |
Steele, Jeff 4 |
(+154) |
103 |
103 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
145 |
21 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
396t |
Steele, Jeff 5 |
(-150) |
83 |
83 |
|
Purdue |
57% |
145 |
19 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
557 |
Steele, Jeff 6 |
(-9) |
61 |
61 |
|
N. Carolina |
59% |
145 |
21 |
12 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
347 |
Stover Jacob |
(-204) |
91 |
91 |
|
Kentucky |
68% |
163 |
23 |
14 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
315 |
Stover, Ian |
(+183) |
98 |
98 |
|
Connecticut |
52% |
139 |
20 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
472 |
Street Certified 1 |
(-59) |
73 |
73 |
|
Nebraska |
54% |
188 |
19 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
289 |
Swistak,Stephanie |
(+161) |
102 |
102 |
|
Connecticut |
51% |
131 |
18 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
100 |
Szafran, Gregg |
(+43) |
123 |
123 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
151 |
21 |
13 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
249 |
Szafran, Gregg 1 |
(+127) |
108 |
108 |
|
Connecticut |
60% |
151 |
22 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
65 |
Szafran, Gregg 2 |
(+28) |
130 |
130 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
151 |
20 |
13 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
76 |
Szafran, Gregg 3 |
(+34) |
127 |
127 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
151 |
19 |
12 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
578t |
Szafran, Gregg 4 |
(-6) |
58 |
58 |
|
N. Carolina |
59% |
151 |
22 |
12 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
494 |
Szafran, Gregg 5 |
(-33) |
69 |
69 |
|
Arizona |
63% |
151 |
23 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
72 |
Tami Corliss 1 |
(+34) |
128 |
128 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
138 |
18 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
473 |
Tami Corliss 2 |
(-44) |
72 |
72 |
|
Houston |
57% |
138 |
24 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
436 |
Tatro, Tom |
(-98) |
78 |
78 |
|
Houston |
59% |
176 |
20 |
13 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
370 |
Tavares, Cole |
(-165) |
86 |
86 |
|
Purdue |
60% |
136 |
20 |
13 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
271 |
Tavares, Mike |
(+158) |
104 |
104 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
135 |
20 |
12 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
156 |
Tavares, Vanessa |
(+76) |
116 |
116 |
|
Connecticut |
46% |
167 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
533 |
Thomas, David 1 |
(-7) |
63 |
63 |
|
Houston |
57% |
141 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
206 |
Thomas, David 2 |
(+118) |
111 |
111 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
141 |
23 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
604 |
Thomas, David 3 |
(-11) |
56 |
56 |
|
Arizona |
52% |
156 |
20 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
644 |
Tom Carder 1 |
(-1) |
51 |
51 |
|
N. Carolina |
54% |
142 |
21 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
585t |
Tom Carder 2 |
(-2) |
57 |
57 |
|
Houston |
60% |
143 |
23 |
13 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
464 |
Tom Carder 3 |
(-51) |
73 |
73 |
|
Purdue |
54% |
140 |
19 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
459 |
Toupin, Tina |
(-55) |
74 |
74 |
|
Houston |
49% |
148 |
18 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
390t |
Treacy,Kevin1 |
(-144) |
83 |
83 |
|
Purdue |
56% |
137 |
19 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
645 |
Troyanovsky, Mark #1 |
(-2) |
51 |
51 |
|
Gonzaga |
54% |
125 |
25 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
274t |
Tucker, Elizabeth |
(-223) |
104 |
104 |
|
Purdue |
63% |
143 |
22 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
189 |
Tucker, Elizabeth 2 |
(+98) |
113 |
113 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
158 |
19 |
9 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
237 |
Vacek, Jamison |
(+121) |
109 |
109 |
|
Connecticut |
57% |
163 |
21 |
8 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
234t |
Vacek, Jamison #3 |
(+124) |
109 |
109 |
|
Connecticut |
62% |
155 |
23 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
346 |
Vacek, Jamison #4 |
(-203) |
91 |
91 |
|
N. Carolina |
63% |
155 |
23 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
NO |
602t |
Vacek, Jamison 2 |
(-9) |
56 |
56 |
|
Houston |
52% |
154 |
20 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
66 |
Vermilyea, Jeff |
(+27) |
130 |
130 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
153 |
20 |
9 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
484 |
Verville, Mark |
(-34) |
70 |
70 |
|
N. Carolina |
60% |
145 |
20 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
25t |
Volpe, Robert |
(+13) |
138 |
138 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
158 |
22 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
234t |
Volpe, Ron |
(+124) |
109 |
109 |
|
Connecticut |
59% |
115 |
21 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
580 |
Walter Nencka |
(-8) |
58 |
58 |
|
N. Carolina |
54% |
152 |
20 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
286 |
Watkins,Todd |
(-226) |
103 |
103 |
|
Purdue |
62% |
111 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
639 |
Weddige, Nicole 1 |
(-9) |
52 |
52 |
|
N. Carolina |
48% |
153 |
18 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
99 |
Weddige, Nicole 2 |
(+44) |
123 |
123 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
146 |
21 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
424 |
Wilcox,Jeff |
(-100) |
79 |
79 |
|
Kentucky |
59% |
171 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
246t |
Wilke, Craig 1 |
(+130) |
108 |
108 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
150 |
18 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
246t |
Wilke, Craig 2 |
(-225) |
108 |
108 |
|
Purdue |
65% |
150 |
22 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
NO |
305 |
Wilke, Craig 3 |
(-227) |
100 |
100 |
|
Purdue |
49% |
150 |
14 |
9 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
NO |
460 |
Wilke, Craig 4 |
(-56) |
74 |
74 |
|
Marquette |
51% |
150 |
16 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
675 |
William Fortunato |
NC (0) |
44 |
44 |
|
N. Carolina |
48% |
154 |
20 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
528 |
William Fortunato 2 |
(-10) |
64 |
64 |
|
N. Carolina |
48% |
145 |
20 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
334 |
William Fortunato 3 |
(+207) |
94 |
94 |
|
Connecticut |
49% |
145 |
20 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
626 |
Wolf, Dylan |
(-4) |
53 |
53 |
|
James Mad |
48% |
160 |
19 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
8 |
Wolf, jamie |
(+7) |
142 |
142 |
|
Connecticut |
67% |
138 |
24 |
9 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
YES! |
564 |
Wolf, jamie 2 |
(-6) |
60 |
60 |
|
Arizona |
51% |
144 |
20 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
NO |
630 |
Wolf. Jamie |
NC (0) |
52 |
52 |
|
Arizona |
54% |
138 |
22 |
9 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
82 |
Wolf. Kim |
(+35) |
126 |
126 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
148 |
20 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
41 |
Woodward Bill |
(+19) |
135 |
135 |
|
Connecticut |
63% |
148 |
21 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
63 |
Woodward, Jason |
(+30) |
130 |
130 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
149 |
22 |
12 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
421 |
Woodward, Jason 2 |
(-97) |
79 |
79 |
|
Houston |
57% |
147 |
21 |
9 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
613 |
Woodward, Jason 3 |
(-6) |
55 |
55 |
|
N. Carolina |
51% |
165 |
19 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
568 |
yu, c |
(-2) |
59 |
59 |
|
N. Carolina |
51% |
131 |
17 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
2 |
Yu, Frank |
(+2) |
147 |
147 |
|
Connecticut |
75% |
131 |
25 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
YES! |
681 |
Yu, Miles |
(-1) |
40 |
40 |
|
Duke |
41% |
163 |
16 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
222 |
yu, s |
(+116) |
110 |
110 |
|
Connecticut |
56% |
143 |
20 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
571 |
yu, too |
(-5) |
59 |
59 |
|
N. Carolina |
60% |
150 |
23 |
12 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NO |
95 |
Zahnman1 |
(+36) |
124 |
124 |
|
Connecticut |
65% |
146 |
22 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
YES! |
124t |
Zahnman2 |
(+58) |
120 |
120 |
|
Connecticut |
68% |
148 |
24 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
YES! |
541 |
Zahnman3 |
(-15) |
63 |
63 |
|
N. Carolina |
62% |
153 |
25 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
684 |
Zahnman4 |
(-2) |
39 |
39 |
|
N. Carolina |
37% |
152 |
15 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
NO |
|